September 07, 2005

Cows don’t have a quivering ______ .
I had a philosophy of law class yesterday that was so good I forgot to take notes. The only thing I remember is the above phrase, but I forget the end. It came in the middle of something about ontology and the dichotomy of “just being” and constant change and the problems human beings create for themselves by being aware of the quivering something of everything changing and how logos is the root of those problems because it makes us separate ourselves from the fact of our being. But cows don’t have that problem. It is so fantastically awesome to be in a class (in law school, remember) where you can answer the prof’s question of why you’re in the class with, “One thing that I’m interested in is language and how law regulates every aspect of our lives through language but no one ever looks at the language to realize that it’s flawed and impossible” and the prof is like, “Yes! That’s exactly it. Law has always felt to me like a translation.” Then he went off on something else and he lost me a bit after that, but still…. Awesome.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

sounds like you hit a patch of passion in otherwise keep-it-in-the-black academia...though is it really true that logos keeps us from our own being? i'm not sure about that...i'd be more inclined to take cognitive linguist Steven Pinker's view that birds fly, beavers build dams, fish swim, and humans use language, in other words, logos is our being...

jw

Natalie said...

hey jonathon, yeah, i'd agree that logos is an essential part of our being... but i'd also assume that it makes our being more difficult, because without it, we'd have no capacity for regret, guilt, ambition, all the different ways of conceptualizing another moment rather than simply being in the moment we're in. i wouldn't want to not be a linguistic animal, but it would be nice to forget the past as soon as it's done and have no idea that there's a potential future. i wonder what Pinker would say about the great apes, who definitely learn and use language, although they don't speak, and who have the same part of the brain that processes grammar in humans (apparently; i read that somewhere, but i can't remember where). to what extent is logos their being?